| Professional
voice users have unique vocal needs
that require special attention. Please click on the image above
to view a videolaryngoscopy of a healthy, asymptomatic professional
singer with normal laryngeal biomechanics. Plasee note that glottal
closure is complete and relaxed without any evidence of supraglottic
involvement. The disability caused by
voice disorders is magnified tremendously when one's livelihood
depends on his or her ability to speak proficiently. In order
to better treat professional voice users we have subclassified
them into 4 separate categories which are listed in Table I.
Table I. Levels of Professional
Voice Use

The professional voice level assists the clinician
in formulating a treatment plan. Higher levels of vocal needs
necessitate more aggressive treatment. In order to assess the
severity of vocal disability we employ several survey tools.
These instruments allow the clinician to document initial disease
severity as well as assess treatment efficacy. We currently
use the voice specific quality of life index (QLI),
the voice handicap index (VHI), and a global assessment of overall
health, the SF-12. The QLI
is displayed in Table 2 below. A QLI
greater than 5 indicates significant vocal disability.

Some of the most common disorders that affect
professional voice users are infection (viral laryngitis), inflammatory
disorders such as laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR),
medications (antihistamines, anxiolytics), tobacco smoke, smog
and other environmental factors, neurologic disorders such as
vocal fold paresis, and "so
called" functional voice disorders (vocal fold misuse or
abuse - see the article entitled The
Demise of Functional Voice Disorders).
Frequently, several different
factors act synergistically to produce the voice disorder.
For instance, a classical singer with a voice specific QLI
of 25 may have laryngopharyngeal reflux, allergies treated with
a medication that causes drying of the mucous membranes, vocal
fold paresis and second-hand exposure to tobacco smoke. Changing
the patients medication or removing the second-hand smoke exposure
may help somewhat (reduction in QLI
to 15), but the patient will not experience maximal improvement
(QLI
< 5) until all factors are addressed and appropriately treated.
Our approach to the vocal professional with
a voice disorder is to first establish the level of disability.
This is accomplished by a comprehensive history, physical examination
and administration of voice specific and global health indexes
such as the voice handicap index (VHI), the voice-specific quality
of life index (QLI), and the SF-12. The level of professional
voice use is identified (Table I) and the vocal needs are tailored
to a specific diagnostic and ultimate therapeutic protocol.
Available diagnostics include stop motion videoendoscopy with
stroboscopy, acoustic analysis with electroglottography, 24
hour pH monitoring to rule out LPR,
and laryngeal electromyography to evaluate vocal
fold paresis. Successful resolution of the voice disorder
is accomplished only after each contributing factor has been
identified and successfully treated.
|